[DNM] Disttask q interval to 3s

[D3Hunter]

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #xxx

Problem Summary:

What changed and how does it work?

Check List

Tests

• Unit test
• Integration test
• Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
• No need to test

  • I checked and no code files have been changed.

Side effects

• Performance regression: Consumes more CPU
• Performance regression: Consumes more Memory
• Breaking backward compatibility

Documentation

• Affects user behaviors
• Contains syntax changes
• Contains variable changes
• Contains experimental features
• Changes MySQL compatibility

Release note

Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.

None

[ti-chi-bot]

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

[ti-chi-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from d3hunter and additionally assign bb7133, benjamin2037, easonn7, hi-rustin, lance6716, windtalker, yujuncen, zimulala for approval(Please ensuring that each of them provides their approval before proceeding). For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS
• br/OWNERS
• br/pkg/storage/OWNERS
• lightning/OWNERS
• pkg/autoid_service/OWNERS
• pkg/config/OWNERS
• pkg/ddl/OWNERS
• pkg/distsql/OWNERS
• pkg/disttask/OWNERS
• pkg/domain/OWNERS
• pkg/executor/importer/OWNERS
• pkg/expression/OWNERS
• pkg/infoschema/OWNERS
• pkg/lightning/OWNERS
• pkg/meta/OWNERS
• pkg/owner/OWNERS
• pkg/parser/OWNERS
• pkg/planner/OWNERS
• pkg/session/OWNERS
• pkg/sessionctx/variable/OWNERS
• pkg/statistics/OWNERS
• pkg/table/OWNERS
• pkg/tablecodec/OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[ti-chi-bot]

This cherry pick PR is for a release branch and has not yet been approved by triage owners.
Adding the do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved label.

To merge this cherry pick:

1. It must be approved by the approvers firstly.
2. AFTER it has been approved by approvers, please wait for the cherry-pick merging approval from triage owners.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[ti-chi-bot]

[FORMAT CHECKER NOTIFICATION]

Notice: To remove the do-not-merge/invalid-title label, please follow title format, for example pkg [, pkg2, pkg3]: what is changed or *: what is changed.

_{📖 For more info, you can check the "Contribute Code" section in the development guide.}

[tiprow]

Hi @D3Hunter. Thanks for your PR.

PRs from untrusted users cannot be marked as trusted with /ok-to-test in this repo meaning untrusted PR authors can never trigger tests themselves. Collaborators can still trigger tests on the PR using /test all.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.