Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GcsToSourceDB template integration test - Spanner Reverse replication writer end to end IT with reader job #1562

Merged

Conversation

darshan-sj
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@darshan-sj darshan-sj requested a review from a team as a code owner May 15, 2024 09:05
@darshan-sj darshan-sj requested review from manitgupta and asthamohta and removed request for a team May 15, 2024 09:05
@darshan-sj darshan-sj marked this pull request as draft May 15, 2024 09:05
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 15, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 17.24138% with 72 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 40.89%. Comparing base (86240cd) to head (f11965f).
Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #1562      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     40.92%   40.89%   -0.04%     
- Complexity     2833     3105     +272     
============================================
  Files           743      744       +1     
  Lines         43295    43385      +90     
  Branches       4620     4629       +9     
============================================
+ Hits          17720    17742      +22     
- Misses        24064    24130      +66     
- Partials       1511     1513       +2     
Components Coverage Δ
spanner-templates 59.60% <ø> (ø)
spanner-import-export 64.45% <ø> (ø)
spanner-live-forward-migration 73.64% <ø> (ø)
spanner-live-reverse-replication 48.66% <ø> (ø)
spanner-bulk-migration 78.07% <ø> (ø)
Files Coverage Δ
...taflow/FlexTemplateDataflowJobResourceManager.java 17.24% <17.24%> (ø)

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

@darshan-sj darshan-sj marked this pull request as ready for review May 16, 2024 05:43
@manitgupta manitgupta added the Google LGTM Approval of a pull request to be merged into the repository label May 17, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This file is missing a license which is why copybara step fails

@copybara-service copybara-service bot merged commit 951944a into GoogleCloudPlatform:main May 24, 2024
18 of 19 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Google LGTM Approval of a pull request to be merged into the repository size/XL
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants