Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correctly fallback during backup copy #64153

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
May 28, 2024

Conversation

antonio2368
Copy link
Member

@antonio2368 antonio2368 commented May 20, 2024

Changelog category (leave one):

  • Bug Fix (user-visible misbehavior in an official stable release)

Changelog entry (a user-readable short description of the changes that goes to CHANGELOG.md):

Fix creating backups to S3 buckets with different credentials from the disk containing the file.

If native copy was disabled or it failed for some known reasons, native copy will fallback to copying using read/write. The problem was that we created both buffers using same client while their credentials could differ.

cc @vitlibar

Documentation entry for user-facing changes

  • Documentation is written (mandatory for new features)

Information about CI checks: https://clickhouse.com/docs/en/development/continuous-integration/

Modify your CI run

NOTE: If your merge the PR with modified CI you MUST KNOW what you are doing
NOTE: Checked options will be applied if set before CI RunConfig/PrepareRunConfig step

Include tests (required builds will be added automatically):

  • Fast test
  • Integration Tests
  • Stateless tests
  • Stateful tests
  • Unit tests
  • Performance tests
  • All with ASAN
  • All with TSAN
  • All with Analyzer
  • All with Azure
  • Add your option here

Exclude tests:

  • Fast test
  • Integration Tests
  • Stateless tests
  • Stateful tests
  • Performance tests
  • All with ASAN
  • All with TSAN
  • All with MSAN
  • All with UBSAN
  • All with Coverage
  • All with Aarch64
  • Add your option here

Extra options:

  • do not test (only style check)
  • disable merge-commit (no merge from master before tests)
  • disable CI cache (job reuse)

Only specified batches in multi-batch jobs:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

@robot-clickhouse-ci-1 robot-clickhouse-ci-1 added the pr-bugfix Pull request with bugfix, not backported by default label May 20, 2024
@robot-clickhouse-ci-1
Copy link
Contributor

robot-clickhouse-ci-1 commented May 20, 2024

This is an automated comment for commit f610af5 with description of existing statuses. It's updated for the latest CI running

❌ Click here to open a full report in a separate page

Check nameDescriptionStatus
A SyncThere's no description for the check yet, please add it to tests/ci/ci_config.py:CHECK_DESCRIPTIONS⏳ pending
CI runningA meta-check that indicates the running CI. Normally, it's in success or pending state. The failed status indicates some problems with the PR⏳ pending
Integration testsThe integration tests report. In parenthesis the package type is given, and in square brackets are the optional part/total tests❌ failure
Mergeable CheckChecks if all other necessary checks are successful⏳ pending
Performance ComparisonMeasure changes in query performance. The performance test report is described in detail here. In square brackets are the optional part/total tests❌ failure
Stateless testsRuns stateless functional tests for ClickHouse binaries built in various configurations -- release, debug, with sanitizers, etc❌ failure
Stress testRuns stateless functional tests concurrently from several clients to detect concurrency-related errors❌ failure
Upgrade checkRuns stress tests on server version from last release and then tries to upgrade it to the version from the PR. It checks if the new server can successfully startup without any errors, crashes or sanitizer asserts❌ failure
Successful checks
Check nameDescriptionStatus
AST fuzzerRuns randomly generated queries to catch program errors. The build type is optionally given in parenthesis. If it fails, ask a maintainer for help✅ success
Bugfix validationChecks that either a new test (functional or integration) or there some changed tests that fail with the binary built on master branch✅ success
ClickBenchRuns [ClickBench](https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickBench/) with instant-attach table✅ success
ClickHouse build checkBuilds ClickHouse in various configurations for use in further steps. You have to fix the builds that fail. Build logs often has enough information to fix the error, but you might have to reproduce the failure locally. The cmake options can be found in the build log, grepping for cmake. Use these options and follow the general build process✅ success
Compatibility checkChecks that clickhouse binary runs on distributions with old libc versions. If it fails, ask a maintainer for help✅ success
Docker keeper imageThe check to build and optionally push the mentioned image to docker hub✅ success
Docker server imageThe check to build and optionally push the mentioned image to docker hub✅ success
Docs checkBuilds and tests the documentation✅ success
Fast testNormally this is the first check that is ran for a PR. It builds ClickHouse and runs most of stateless functional tests, omitting some. If it fails, further checks are not started until it is fixed. Look at the report to see which tests fail, then reproduce the failure locally as described here✅ success
Flaky testsChecks if new added or modified tests are flaky by running them repeatedly, in parallel, with more randomization. Functional tests are run 100 times with address sanitizer, and additional randomization of thread scheduling. Integration tests are run up to 10 times. If at least once a new test has failed, or was too long, this check will be red. We don't allow flaky tests, read the doc✅ success
Install packagesChecks that the built packages are installable in a clear environment✅ success
PR CheckThere's no description for the check yet, please add it to tests/ci/ci_config.py:CHECK_DESCRIPTIONS✅ success
Stateful testsRuns stateful functional tests for ClickHouse binaries built in various configurations -- release, debug, with sanitizers, etc✅ success
Style checkRuns a set of checks to keep the code style clean. If some of tests failed, see the related log from the report✅ success
Unit testsRuns the unit tests for different release types✅ success

@antonio2368 antonio2368 force-pushed the fix-backup-without-native-copy branch from de46c32 to d66f0d6 Compare May 21, 2024 08:36
@divanik divanik self-assigned this May 21, 2024
@antonio2368 antonio2368 force-pushed the fix-backup-without-native-copy branch from 06a963c to b80d878 Compare May 21, 2024 11:29
@vitlibar vitlibar self-assigned this May 24, 2024
src/IO/S3/copyS3File.h Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/Disks/DiskEncrypted.h Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@antonio2368 antonio2368 requested a review from vitlibar May 27, 2024 12:41
@antonio2368 antonio2368 force-pushed the fix-backup-without-native-copy branch from 100c73b to 8f77503 Compare May 27, 2024 13:02
@antonio2368 antonio2368 added this pull request to the merge queue May 28, 2024
Merged via the queue into master with commit 9f24239 May 28, 2024
230 of 247 checks passed
@antonio2368 antonio2368 deleted the fix-backup-without-native-copy branch May 28, 2024 13:33
@robot-clickhouse robot-clickhouse added the pr-synced-to-cloud The PR is synced to the cloud repo label May 28, 2024
@antonio2368 antonio2368 added pr-must-backport Pull request should be backported intentionally. Use this label with great care! pr-must-backport-cloud labels May 28, 2024
robot-clickhouse added a commit that referenced this pull request May 28, 2024
…df375b0554d48b14574ad4e9051f7

Cherry pick #64153 to 24.5: Correctly fallback during backup copy
robot-ch-test-poll4 added a commit that referenced this pull request May 28, 2024
Backport #64153 to 24.5: Correctly fallback during backup copy
robot-ch-test-poll added a commit that referenced this pull request May 29, 2024
…df375b0554d48b14574ad4e9051f7

Cherry pick #64153 to 24.2: Correctly fallback during backup copy
robot-ch-test-poll added a commit that referenced this pull request May 29, 2024
…df375b0554d48b14574ad4e9051f7

Cherry pick #64153 to 24.3: Correctly fallback during backup copy
robot-ch-test-poll added a commit that referenced this pull request May 29, 2024
…df375b0554d48b14574ad4e9051f7

Cherry pick #64153 to 24.4: Correctly fallback during backup copy
@robot-ch-test-poll robot-ch-test-poll added the pr-backports-created Backport PRs are successfully created, it won't be processed by CI script anymore label May 29, 2024
robot-ch-test-poll1 added a commit that referenced this pull request May 29, 2024
Backport #64153 to 24.4: Correctly fallback during backup copy
robot-ch-test-poll1 added a commit that referenced this pull request May 29, 2024
Backport #64153 to 24.2: Correctly fallback during backup copy
robot-ch-test-poll1 added a commit that referenced this pull request May 29, 2024
Backport #64153 to 24.3: Correctly fallback during backup copy
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pr-backports-created Backport PRs are successfully created, it won't be processed by CI script anymore pr-backports-created-cloud pr-bugfix Pull request with bugfix, not backported by default pr-must-backport Pull request should be backported intentionally. Use this label with great care! pr-must-backport-cloud pr-synced-to-cloud The PR is synced to the cloud repo
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants