-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 187
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Report Stuttering as Back to state if a moot action is taken #871
Labels
enhancement
Lets change things for the better
help wanted
We need your help
Tools
The command line tools - TLC, SANY, ...
Comments
Please attach the counterexample to the stuttering violation. |
Here is the output:
|
Sounds reasonable to make this "cosmetic" change. Do you have the bandwidth to provide a patch? |
lemmy
added
enhancement
Lets change things for the better
Tools
The command line tools - TLC, SANY, ...
help wanted
We need your help
labels
Feb 5, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement
Lets change things for the better
help wanted
We need your help
Tools
The command line tools - TLC, SANY, ...
The spec I've attached below reports a stuttering violation. This is confusing to me as there is an always enabled, strongly fair action
SendLock
. I believe that the actionSendLock
is taken in the "stuttering step" of the violation, but it isn't being reported since there is no change in state. Is it possible to have TLC report this as Back to state or otherwise report the action that was taken?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: