You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
in quickwit, we found that some query are faster when range queries are done through the ast, using fastfield-based range query, but some others prefer post filtering done inside the collector. This hints toward implementing two forms of fastfield-based range query, the current one when the range is very selective, and the "more naive filtering" when the range isn't very selective. The selection would also depend on how costly the rest of the query is, costlier queries tends to favor the currently present query, while cheaper queries seems to prefer filtering
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
in quickwit, we found that some query are faster when range queries are done through the ast, using fastfield-based range query, but some others prefer post filtering done inside the collector. This hints toward implementing two forms of fastfield-based range query, the current one when the range is very selective, and the "more naive filtering" when the range isn't very selective. The selection would also depend on how costly the rest of the query is, costlier queries tends to favor the currently present query, while cheaper queries seems to prefer filtering
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: