-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: collections/docs for modelfiles with models #529
Comments
yes, looking at GenAI stack from docker,neo4j. I am looking for a way to integrate a neo4j knowledge graph which has structured data and RAG pdf chunk data. |
Any plans on that feature? |
What's the approach? I'm also very interested in this feature. If there's a roadmap, id be glad to help realize it. |
Blockers: #665 |
This is really what is missing right now to make the assistent setup really great |
How can I help? Is there any test to perform? |
Any news on that? |
I'll prioritise this feature for v0.4.0! |
Hello Timothy,
That will be great but I think it should be associated with
…-Enabling multi workspaces
-A workspace could have its own models, documents ,prompts.
-A workspace should be associated with its own embedded vector database base
-a workspace could be accessed by a group of users, thanks to the creator
and the managers of a workspace.
Hope we could discuss about these features.
And once again, 'BRAVO' for your project.
François, from France
Le sam. 8 juin 2024, 09:18, Timothy Jaeryang Baek ***@***.***>
a écrit :
I'll prioritise this feature for v0.4.0!
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#529 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABKZRFHNWFHMSTOMNJ3WJV3ZGKV3VAVCNFSM6AAAAABCCCQZ2CVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCNJVHA2TCMBXGU>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
It's frustrating having to mention documents manually every time.
Describe the solution you'd like
It would be nice to have a RAG integration inside the Modelfiles definition.
OpenAI and their GPTs allow users to activate RAG and upload documents upon creation of a new GPT.
It would be really amazing to have such a feature ;)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: