Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[QUESTION] docker hub image tags #799

Closed
ezekel opened this issue May 17, 2024 · 4 comments
Closed

[QUESTION] docker hub image tags #799

ezekel opened this issue May 17, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@ezekel
Copy link

ezekel commented May 17, 2024

Hi ,

I am confuse what is the difference of this tags , and which one should I pull to use in my dockerfile ?

dunglas/frankenphp:static-builder-sha-73e9b64

dunglas/frankenphp:sha-469070c-builder-php8.3-alpine

dunglas/frankenphp:sha-e7e0dbf-php8.3-bookworm

Thank you in advance

@withinboredom
Copy link
Collaborator

Maybe we should update the readme in Docker hub explaining the tag formulas?

@dunglas
Copy link
Owner

dunglas commented May 17, 2024

We definitely need to improve the docs.

The main images (no specific variant) are FrankenPHP itself.
"builder" variants are for building FrankenPHP with custom Caddy modules: https://frankenphp.dev/docs/docker/#how-to-install-more-caddy-modules
"static-builder" variants are for creating statically compiled builds of FrankenPHP as well as embedding PHP apps in the binary itself: https://frankenphp.dev/docs/static/#linux

@aungmyatmoethegreat
Copy link

Please improve the tag name resolution; it's difficult to understand. I am in the process of formalizing all the tags in my Dockerfile.

Screenshot 2024-05-24 at 1 35 43 PM

@dunglas
Copy link
Owner

dunglas commented May 24, 2024

This is ongoing. Closing in favor of #776, which tracks the progress on this topic.

@dunglas dunglas closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale May 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants