You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@cdcseacave Hello, is it possible for the dense matching algorithm in openmvs to be used for depth estimation between microlens images collected by a light field camera(Plenoptic camera 2.0, such as raytrix)? Looking forward to your reply, I will be grateful. Tks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Not directly, but i think it can be adapted. However there are dedicated algorithms for such cameras with much better performance, like those from Disney research (forgot the name now)
@cdcseacave@pmoulon Thanks both for your answers. I have read the paper in the link you gave. It is a depth estimation algorithm for image data collected by plenoptic camera 1.0. However, the current mainstream light field camera is plenoptic camera 2.0, which is a focused light field camera. The data obtained in a single photo is thousands of microlens images. The depth estimation algorithm for this type of data is different from that of 1.0.
@cdcseacave Hello, is it possible for the dense matching algorithm in openmvs to be used for depth estimation between microlens images collected by a light field camera(Plenoptic camera 2.0, such as raytrix)? Looking forward to your reply, I will be grateful. Tks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: