Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Differences in Talker Embedding Extraction #90

Open
rppravin opened this issue Apr 22, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Differences in Talker Embedding Extraction #90

rppravin opened this issue Apr 22, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@rppravin
Copy link

rppravin commented Apr 22, 2021

TalkerEmbQn

In the Auto VC paper, it seems,

  • S2 is estimated from > 20 sec of speech for a given talker
  • Es(X1) is estimated from the speech segment input to the content encoder

Even though both these representations are estimated for the same talker, they are estimated based on different input speech. S2 is potentially based on longer speech duration. So, there could be some differences between the two talker embedding representations.

However, in the codebase, S2 is reused in the place Es(X1). Any idea on how much impact this will have on the extent of dis-entanglement of content and talker representation? Since Es(X1) could be based on shorter speech duration, will it be useful to estimate it separately, so that network learns to dis-entangle only what is appropriate talker information for a given input speech segment?

Thanks,
Pravin

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant