Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Setting up second WireHole server for failover/redundancy #65

Open
JoshLoecker opened this issue Jan 19, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Setting up second WireHole server for failover/redundancy #65

JoshLoecker opened this issue Jan 19, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@JoshLoecker
Copy link

I'd like to start by saying thank you for putting this together - it's been working great!

As the title states, would it be possible to add a second instance of this for automatic failover redundancy? For example, I have the networking stack set up on Server 1, and it goes down. Is it possible for clients to automatically switch to Server 2?

I'm not sure how well this would work because if I add Server 2 as a client to Server 1's WireGuard, then if it goes down, I can't use Server 2's PiHole instance anyway.

I suppose a simple method would be to have Server 1 and Server 2 as separate configurations in the WireGuard client, but it would be neat to have an automatic failover.

I'm not well versed in networking, and I appreciate any input! (even if it's a "no, this can't be done")

@JoshLoecker JoshLoecker changed the title Setting up second PiHole/WireGuard server for failover/redundancy Setting up second WireHole server for failover/redundancy Jan 19, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant